Questioning Session of the witness Tabuni Buchtar in the Fiktor Yeimo Makar(treason) case in Jayapura District Court on:
Thursday March 22, 2010.

The trial examination of witnesses on Tabuni Buchtar, this Assembly has been examined by Judge ... ... ... ... ..., the Public Prosecutor, Makel Rambolangi SH and Legal Counsel for and Gustaf Kawer did Peter ELL , but does not prove the defendant Viktor Yeimo is guilty of Makar(treason), and following the questions were asked of Buchtar Tabuni as witnesses and the Panel of Judges, Public Prosecutor and Legal Advisor are as follows:

Legal Counsel: What is our vision and mission KNPB?

Buchtar Tabuni witnesses: KNPB is a Papua People's National media and mediation are all genuine aspirations of the people of the nation of Papua and KNPB KNPB not based organizations but is the media.

Legal Counsel: Is there a notification letter to the Police?

Buchtar Tabuni witness: there is.

Legal Counsel: Are papers in Pamphlets contain banners and pictures morning star flag that indicates that the West Papuan people demand independence?

Buchtar Tabuni witness: Yes it's true that the morning star flag was the people's aspirations and all the banners that are not the maker of the dynamics, except for inciting mass, and harming other people's so-called "maker".

Legal Counsel: Is KNPB is TPN / OPM or separatist?

Buchtar Tabuni witnesses: Not KNPB is the nation's media folk madiasi aspirations of the people of Papua to Papua.

Legal Counsel: Is it after a rally the next day there was a criminal act by the defendant?

Buchtar Tabuni witness: Defendant Viktor Yeimo not committed a crime.

Legal Counsel: Did KNPB mediation participate in Economic, Education and Health?

Buchtar Tabuni witness: Yes KNPB Mediasikan All.

Panel of Judges: Is it how many years KNPB?

Buchtar Tabuni witnesses: 3 years.

The panel of judges: Is there KNPB Moot District in Papua?

Buchtar Tabuni Witness: Yes there is the whole district and I was the General Chairman of the Central management agencies.

Panel of Judges: Why not Fiktor Yeimo Fiktor Lead Lecture and Demo action?

Buctar Tabuni witnesses: Demo Action Fiktor do because of my command, and if the Assembly vicki judges acquit brothers so he could lecture.

Prosecutor: Is Action demo dated March 10, 2009 was kalanjutan from the date of 16 October 2008?

Buchtar Tabuni Witness: Yes it KNPB mediasikan the aspirations of the people.

Panel of Judges: Is sapanduk and Pamblet the writing and the concept of who?

Buchtar Tabuni witness: No, because I know that writing is also in custody LP so.

The panel of judges: whether Papua Merdeka then what?

Buchtar Tabuni: People of Papua towards independence because independence is part of the rights of the Papuans, they initially demanded freedom Indonesia conducts Choice in 1969 is not in accordance with the procedures of international law, then the people of Papua whenever they will still be demanding independence Free Papua sampapi.

Thus the end of words Buctar Tabuni say that; Fiktor Yeimo as a coordinator to coordinate the action on March 10, 2009, and all my responsibility is not Fiktor Yeimo he CEDAW only to coordinate the course so I ask that judges acquit the defendant because the sisters This examination of all not proven.

Report by:Yasons Sambom
West Papua human rights activist.

Images: